Great Policies, Terrible Practice: Only Yes-Men Thrive Here - werkgeversreview Anonieme werknemer bij ASSP

2,0
18 apr 2025
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Great cause. Members are great people.

Minpunten

Since the new leadership took over, the culture has taken a hit. There’s a clear bias toward those who go along with whatever leadership says—disagreement isn’t welcome. People have been told to stay quiet in meetings, and those who speak up or challenge the status quo often find themselves sidelined or excluded. Hard-working employees aren’t recognized unless they’re part of the “in” crowd. Volunteer leadership roles also seem to go to those who play along, not necessarily the most capable or committed. Meanwhile, the teams that actually bring in money are constantly understaffed, while other departments—especially the ones close to leadership—keep growing. The company has solid policies on paper, but in practice, they’re applied selectively. It’s not about fairness—it’s about who’s in favor. If you're looking for a place that values honest input and rewards merit, this probably isn’t it right now.

Ontdek andere reviews over ASSP

5,0
1 mrt 2022
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Provide free safety devices to companies & industries

Minpunten

Not work, but learning volunteer experiences

2,0
25 apr 2025
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Strong Benefits Package: Competitive and comprehensive, contributing positively to work-life balance. Supportive Colleagues: Many dedicated and passionate team members who are great to work with. Meaningful Mission: Working in support of workplace safety gives purpose and pride in the work being done.

Minpunten

Lack of Open Dialogue: In recent years, there’s been a noticeable decline in the openness to certain staff ideas. Suggestions that differ from the prevailing view are often dismissed without discussion, making participation feel discouraged—even in meetings designed for collaboration. Disregard for Staff Feedback: Employee surveys and comments are not being utilized constructively, despite their intended purpose of improving organizational health. Return to Silos: After making progress toward collaborative teamwork, the organization has reverted to siloed decision-making. Subject-matter experts are often left out of relevant discussions. Devaluing Tenure: Long-term employees sometimes feel that their loyalty and institutional knowledge are no longer respected or valued. Lack of Inclusivity for Different Work Styles: Introverted team members or those with quieter approaches are often overlooked, rather than being recognized for their strengths and unique contributions. Overreliance on External Consultants: In situations where internal expertise exists, outside consultants are often brought in instead. This not only overlooks the knowledge and experience of current staff who have been close to the situation but can also bypass more thoughtful, inclusive internal processes.

4
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle