Interpreter - werkgeversreview Interpreter III bij Atrium Health

2,0
5 jun 2018
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Good teamwork. The people are great to work with. Every encounter is different, it keeps you doing new stuff every day. It’s a good job to start the career and to learn discipline as an interpreter. The good at the cafeterias is good. You can use your badge to pay for food and it will come out of you paycheck. Use it with care. Direct managers can be hit or miss but with a small teams (like this department) they make are very helpful. Management is willing to let you shadow other positions in case you want to change departments down the line.

Minpunten

Insurance is awful. Compensation is below par with a master’s degree in this field. High school diploma is enough. Management makes decision on money but the decisions affects how the departments are able to help patients. Some departments are understaffed due to cuts to reach economic goals. Remuneration takes time build up. This isn’t a a con BUT you need to have thick skin because sometimes you’ll be under a lot of pressure because everyone will need the interpreter at the same time

Ontdek andere reviews over Atrium Health

5,0
27 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Good benefits, work life balance

Minpunten

have to use PTO for holidays

1
2,0
21 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Minpunten

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle