Overall solid entry-level career, great work/life balance and management, career development could be improved - werkgeversreview Consultant bij CGI

4,0
30 mrt 2010
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

- Great work/life balance and very flexible time-wise - Laid back culture - Management trusts you to get the work done and doesn't micro-manage your activities, even if you're entry level - Directors are open and accessible to talk to - A fair amount of responsibility from the get-go - Good amount of client interaction and responsibility on the projects - Competitive pay and benefits at the onset

Minpunten

- No established training program; need to learn necessary software pretty much on your own - No pre-determined career path; a positive for some, but others like a more clear direction of growth, while at CGI you can pretty much stay at the same level for several years if you nobody above you steps down or you don't specifically request to be transferred to a different project - The laid back culture may be too relaxed for some - Projects can be repetitive and boring at times

Ontdek andere reviews over CGI

5,0
18 jun 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Work life balance, growth, quality

Minpunten

Less pay compared to market

1,0
16 jun 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Minpunten

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle