Mathematica's outward growth has come at the expense of internal development - werkgeversreview Program Associate bij Mathematica

2,0
30 nov 2019
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

- Colleagues (at your level) are friendly and welcoming - Ability to work remotely - Good resume builder for recent college grads

Minpunten

I continue to be disappointed by Mathematica's unrealized potential. As a junior -level employee, I was given an outsized amount of responsibility that was completely out-of-sync with my compensation. My workload was overwhelming (at times reaching 175% staffed) while the work itself was boring and repetitive. We were constantly told that Mathematica was an employee -run company with a dedication to collegiality, but myself and my colleagues were constantly put down and dismissed whenever we tried to contribute something outside of our immediate task list. Direct managers are unable to help with most issues and challenges since their primary role is to organize staffing. Also, Mathematica is chronically understaffed, to the extent that people very rarely have a say in the types of projects and roles they are assigned to. When I was hired, I accepted the offer (and low salary) for the opportunity to pursue several clear interests that were made known to my manager at the start. I never once got to engage on any of these projects, and was consistently pigeonholed in a role that had nothing to do with my own interests or goals. Last, opportunities for advancement, raises, professional development, or trainings were constantly presented and then taken away, or they simply failed to materialize. There was zero transparency around raises or employee reviews, and junior level staff were often gaslit into thinking they were solely responsible for their own raises and development when it was actually project directors who submit all feedback (in a closed-door process), make recommendations, and oftentimes believe that their project should be everyone's #1 priority. TL:DR - Mathematica has been growing quickly, but is doing very little to improve internally. Although junior level positions are occasionally good resume-builders, poor management and low salaries make this a role that one cannot stay in long-term.

Ontdek andere reviews over Mathematica

5,0
11 apr 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Great colleagues, 401k match, and interesting work

Minpunten

Work life balance could be improved and more ability to move between departments

3,0
29 jun 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Smart people, impactful work. A real community.

Minpunten

Poor strategic planning. Rather than performing real analysis and proactive thinking, leadership reacts to the environment. Strategy development and implementation at Mathematica seems like leadership throws wet spaghetti against the wall to see what sticks. In the 2010s, it was predictive modeling. Rather than proactively using predictive modeling to support their client's goals and the organization's mission, they created a data analytics division, hired smart people, and provided no guidance to support the division. Today, AI has replaced predictive modeling. These examples provide two instances of failures of corporate leadership; many more exist. Unfortunately, the company suffers from short-term incentives and an aversion to long-term investments. As an employee-owned company, you would think that the board and leadership would be more responsive to the employees. No! Over time, they have removed employees' voices from decision-making and focused on increasing their own power and independence.

2
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle