Lumbering Underfed Dinosaur - werkgeversreview Senior Research Scientist bij NASA

2,0
6 jun 2017
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

You get to put stuff in space sometimes. Compared with other govt agencies they hire a lot of foreign nationals.

Minpunten

Civil servants cannot be fired so its mostly a lot of middle aged guys waiting around to retire. Where you are based geographically makes a dramatic difference to your experience and quality of living, e.g. you probably don't want to go to Alabama - unless you already live there. The daring and innovation of the 1960s is long gone, except where it survives in a few isolated pockets. It's old school thinking. Managers care more about how things look to their superiors than the well-being of their engineers. Foreign nationals make up a large fraction of the work force, but it is almost impossible for them to become civil servants, without becoming a citizen. So there is no job security for green card holders, you can only be a contracted worker. Some bogus middleman "body shop" company takes a 40% chunk of the money that NASA puts aside for your salary and upkeep. Also, in my experience, some member of the executive branch of the civil service treat contract workers like they belong in a lower social class, even if they have been working on NASA projects for a decade. Definitely that feeling pervades the whole agency. Bolden knows very little about science, hardly surprising given his background as a pilot. NASA's budget in real terms is now 10% of what it was in the 1960s. If you get grants from other agencies, the NASA center you work at keeps 25% of it before you see a dime. Bureaucracy is everywhere, its like a Dilbert comic strip.

Ontdek andere reviews over NASA

5,0
3 jul 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

So many ways to engage yourself in the work Great hours, benefits

Minpunten

Pay is rather low for Aerospace, even as an intern

1,0
4 jul 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

I have nothing good to say.

Minpunten

If you are the victim of a crime or experience something illegal connected to NASA, do not blindly trust the internal process to protect you. In my experience, NASA has built relationships with local and federal agencies in a way that can push people right back into NASA’s own internal channels, including HR, the Inspector General, and Protective Services. The problem is that those offices may not have the authority, independence, or experience to properly handle serious criminal or legal issues. Once you are back inside that system, the priority can quickly become protecting the organization, managing liability, and controlling the narrative instead of protecting the person who was harmed. Victim intimidation is not just possible in that kind of environment. It should be expected. Once the organization is involved in controlling the process, the person reporting harm can end up pressured, isolated, discredited, or steered away from outside accountability. That is unacceptable. Victims should not be forced into a process where the organization involved gets to influence how the matter is handled. Internal offices are not a replacement for real legal protection, outside law enforcement, or independent legal counsel. If something illegal happens to you, talk to a lawyer first. Get independent advice. Have your attorney guide you through the appropriate outside agencies and legal channels. Do not assume NASA’s internal process is neutral, independent, or designed to protect you.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle