This company is trash - werkgeversreview Advance Technician bij SAESL

1,0
15 apr 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Welfare is good. good medical benefit. Can claim up to 1.6k per year.

Minpunten

I dont know where is this company direction going. They want to make it big in the aviation industry but the management , policies, rules are making employeess on the shopfloor very difficult to follow. So many incident happen ina such a short time. They didnt think who causes all these. Always rush and rush to get the engine out. When thing happens push the blame to u and get warning letter for nothing. Do they even know in aviation, we cant rush just to get engine out in the shortest turnaround time? Greedy management. All types of stupid rules and they just implement immediately and u must follow. If u dont, be prepared to face the consequences. They dont care what the employess is going through. If u do something wrong, they will just give u warning letter or just sack you. Do they know what is human error in human factor? Totally no empathy. Every year, people from the shopfloor are having mass resignation from all over production. That is why u always see this company emplying people. On the outside, it look really glamorous to be in such a big company. AVOID this company at all cost. If u reading and contemplating to join this company pertaining to shopfloor job suggest u look else. Even a cleaner job is better than this.

Ontdek andere reviews over SAESL

3,0
5 feb 2022
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Able to see alot cool stuff like the engine

Minpunten

Super ulu, one canteen and 2 stalls

1,0
4 jul 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Flexi benefits That's about it.

Minpunten

SAESL's management appears to place limited emphasis on talent retention. Employees across all levels, from technicians to executives, often seem to be viewed as easily replaceable, which can negatively affect morale and long-term employee commitment. The organizational structure also appears to have a disproportionately high number of managers and vice presidents. This can result in excessive discussion and oversight, while delaying decisive action. There is a perception that responsibility is frequently shifted between teams instead of focusing on resolving underlying issues. The Quality department is another area of concern. Rather than providing practical guidance and value-added support, it is often perceived as redirecting quality-related issues to the Engineering department. This creates the impression that accountability is being transferred instead of collaboratively addressing problems and preventing their recurrence.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle