Overworked and Under-Supported, Despite Ambition - werkgeversreview Anonieme werknemer bij Selective Insurance

1,0
20 mrt 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Talented and collaborative co-workers who make the day-to-day work enjoyable. Hybrid schedule provides flexibility and some work-life balance. Leadership shows ambition and willingness to try new initiatives and programs. Town halls with the CEO provide transparency and the opportunity to ask questions directly.

Minpunten

Morale is declining rapidly, driven by leadership instability and lack of support. Managers are stepping down at an alarming rate, and many employees are avoiding leadership roles altogether. The company frequently rolls out multiple initiatives without clear direction, adequate resources, or realistic expectations. Regional teams are especially impacted, expected to absorb this work without sufficient support, which leads to burnout. There are not enough underwriting or operational roles within the regions to sustain these initiatives. Operational infrastructure is a major gap. Many regions lack dedicated support functions such as marketing, events, product, HR, IT, and design teams - forcing employees to take on significant responsibilities outside their roles without additional compensation or recognition. Career advancement opportunities in these spaces are limited, and high performers are often left in stagnant, thankless roles. Rather than developing talent, employees are often assigned expanded responsibilities beyond a sustainable capacity. Overall career development is lacking. Top performers frequently leave for higher-paying opportunities elsewhere with less stress. Processes are inefficient, and talent is often constrained by nonfunctional systems. HR is a consistent pain point. Confidentiality is a concern, support is limited, and there is a disconnect in understanding employee roles. HR often functions as a pass-through for leadership rather than a true advocate, with little innovation or modern approaches to employee development and retention. Work-life balance is poor across the organization. Expectations—especially in underwriting—are unrealistic and exhausting. Flexibility is often denied, even for reasonable schedule adjustments, despite messaging promoting a flexible culture. Upper leadership does not appear to understand the realities of working parents or the demands employees face on a daily basis with territory sizes. Processes and communication are inefficient. Vendor and contract approvals can take months, IT issues persist, and priorities frequently shift without clear communication. Goals are often unattainable, and corporate initiatives frequently overwhelm teams without proper alignment or follow-through. Many leaders feel they are simply “checking a box” for upper leadership, and frustrations are openly discussed among teams. Managers are paralyzed once in their position and have no desire to develop themselves, creating barriers for those who do - We’re losing young talent because of it. Policies are applied inconsistently. The emphasis on badge swipes and in-office tracking feels out of touch, particularly when field roles are not held to the same standards and performance or travel is ignored. While there is a sense of job security, it is overshadowed by poor communication, lack of direction, weak infrastructure, siloed leadership, a costly new corporate office location, and increasing frustration across teams.

Ontdek andere reviews over Selective Insurance

5,0
17 apr 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Strong but difficult leadership during transformation.

Minpunten

Relocation causing some some concern

2
1,0
26 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Decent benefits and decent coworkers

Minpunten

Working at Selective was a toxic work environment shaped by favoritism, excessive workload expectations, and poor boundaries around employee availability. Management often applied expectations unevenly, which created a lack of fairness and accountability. High performance did not always seem to be the primary factor in decision-making, which undermined trust in leadership. There was also a strong “big fish, small pond” dynamic, where internal status and informal influence often carried more weight than actual performance or collaboration. This contributed to a highly political environment where trust between colleagues was limited and information did not always feel safe to share openly. Employees were expected to be available far beyond normal working hours, creating an unsustainable “always on” culture with no real work-life balance. The workload was consistently too high for the compensation provided. Internal politics further interfered with day-to-day work and made collaboration more difficult than it needed to be. In practice, this environment often encouraged self-preservation over teamwork, which made it difficult to build trust or rely on others consistently. Overall, the environment was not structured in a way that supported long-term employee wellbeing or retention. This is not a workplace that supports a healthy work-life balance. For me, the experience felt unsustainable, and over time it became clear that the environment was not conducive to long-term growth or wellbeing.

2
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle