Inspiring Mission, But Challenges Employees with Intense Workload and Organizational Changes - werkgeversreview Anonieme werknemer bij Array (NY)

4,0
10 mei 2023
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

The company culture is great, and there's a strong emphasis on collaboration and teamwork. Everyone is willing to lend a helping hand when needed, and there's a real sense of camaraderie among the staff. The technology we use is top-notch, and the development team is constantly working to improve it. As an employee, it's great to work with cutting-edge tools and know that we're always striving to stay ahead of the curve. The company's mission is something I can really get behind, and it's inspiring to know that our work is making a positive impact on people's lives. It's motivating to come to work every day knowing that we're doing something important.

Minpunten

The pace of work can be quite intense at times, and there are periods where we're expected to put in long hours to meet deadlines. It can be stressful, but it's also rewarding when we're able to deliver a great product on time. Communication can sometimes be a challenge, particularly when working across different teams or with remote colleagues. There are processes in place to try and mitigate this, but it can still be frustrating at times. The company is growing quickly, which is great, but it also means that there are sometimes organizational changes that can be difficult to keep up with. It's important to be adaptable and open to change in this environment.

Ontdek andere reviews over Array (NY)

5,0
1 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Clear expectations at a very stable organization.

Minpunten

High expectations can lead to friction in some cases

1,0
6 apr 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Got paid for interview and onboarding

Minpunten

I went through what felt like a “ghost job” type of process. I was given a two-day technical assessment that required very little sleep and included pulling an all-nighter. The assignment was highly realistic and closely resembled production-level work in both scope and expectations. A significant amount of time and effort was required before even having a clearly established or confirmed role. This also included a CCAT assessment as part of the screening process, along with employment verification, ~45 pages of documents, and several hours of video content. After that, I was asked to record two 5–10 minute videos based on those materials, with very minimal prompts and no clear grading criteria or expectations. I was then told I scored just slightly below “acceptable” and was terminated immediately. The entire process felt disorganized from start to finish. The technical assessment was missing key pieces, almost as if it was incomplete or still being tested. During onboarding, I was already being added to meetings and even assigned a task, despite not having fully completed the onboarding process. Part of the reasoning given for my termination was that I wasn’t proactive in pointing out that I had been added to meetings and should have been focusing on onboarding instead. This was especially confusing, as those meetings and tasks were initiated by the team themselves. Given the amount of upfront work required and how the process was structured, this raised serious concerns for me about whether the role was clearly defined or fully established, and whether the expectations for candidates were aligned with an actual longterm position. Advice to others: Be cautious about the time commitment required before the role is fully secured. The process may require substantial effort upfront without clear expectations or evaluation criteria.

9
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle