SAT Rater - werkgeversreview SAT Rater bij ETS

1,0
14 okt 2016
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Working from home is a plus

Minpunten

Despite having a grading rubric to score from, this is a highly subjective role and your manager is ALWAYS right even when they are wrong. ETS allows them to be this way because they usually have at least a masters degree so it only stands to reason that they are perfect and know everything. This is also a company that allows sexual discrimination. If you are a female then you are good to go...it is a 'good 'ole girl's club' and they are proud of it. It is not worth wasting your time for 15 or so hours per month. You can sign up for almost full time but you won't get it and you will get very few hours. I intend to just not show up for work from now on. Have had many discrepancies with my leads and they always win out. Have had a PhD who essentially scored everyone as a 1 (lowest possible score). These are high school kids for God's sake, what do you expect? She was/is sexist.

Ontdek andere reviews over ETS

5,0
12 aug 2025
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Intelligent, caring, hardworking, professional co-workers

Minpunten

I'm told they have greatly changed since, new CEO

2
1,0
22 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Support of immediate management and coworkers makes coming to work every day a pleasure.

Minpunten

Where to start... First, the employee performance evaluation process and methodology has changed from 1) performance vs your job description to 2) OKRs which were completely unattainable and meaningless at every level to 3) rocks and outcomes which again have very little to do with the day to day jobs of most employees. It seems the burden for goals and objectives and performance management has shifted from management to employees as they try to define a methodology that holds only doers responsible for the company's success. All this since Amit Sevak took over. Management manipulated the questions in a recent employee survey to force responses that made it look like there was improvement year over year. Of course, when you add a new President between the employees and the CEO peoples opinion of senior management is improved. Of course when you shift the focus to immediate management from senior management, the responses will be improved. Try issuing the exact same survey as the prior year and see how much "real" improvement there was in the numbers.

1
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle