The Least Challenging and Rewarding 9 months of my life - Repetitive & Uninspiring - werkgeversreview Research Associate bij GLG

1,0
24 sep 2018
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

- There is a great sense of camaraderie between Research Associates at GLG. Everyone hates it after 3 months. If they stay, it's because they have to or because they haven't found anything else yet. - If you're lucky enough, you'll stumble upon a project which actually interests you and through that you'll get to interact with interesting experts. (Make the most of it) - The people, some experts and the salary are the only things that kept me sane for that long.

Minpunten

-The nature of the work at GLG is simply mindless. As a Research Associate you'll sit at your desk for 9+ hours per day sifting through endless pages of LinkedIn searches, looking for experts and duping them into thinking that you are offering them an interesting consulting opportunity. I felt like I was getting dumber and dumber, the more time I spent at GLG. -No chances to grow A fictitious 'Senior Research Associate' position is continuously waived in your face like some sort of reward, which can only be achieved if some ridiculous and counterproductive metric is reached. The metrics are dependent on the amount of recruits you add to the network... effectively making this a recruiting job. Also, trainings are a lie, they are specific to GLG and cannot be applied in any other context (maybe at Alphasights if that's your thing). -Unhealthy levels of micromanagement EVERY SINGLE MINUTE is accounted for. You are sitting next to your manager who basically watches over you for the entirety of the working day. No ownership in your work, no responsibilities. Key words to watch out for which are simply lies: "Thought-partner with the client" - False, client is convinced GLG is a call centre that charges a lot. "Research" - False, the research is a recruiting search. Not research. "Networking with industry leaders and key thinkers" - False. The experts are convinced Associates and GLG staff are dumb, and the majority are so frustrated with the GLG process that they are not interested in an actual conversation about the 'projects' "Project management' - False. This involves a 10-15 minute search on the topic, followed by a project write up which usually takes 10 minutes, followed by the pressing of a button which send a mass invite to the experts. This is not project management.

Ontdek andere reviews over GLG

5,0
31 mrt 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Amazing people - lots of reviews say that because it's true. You'll work with smart, genuine, hard working humans. Good benefits and perks. Interesting events and opportunities to learn. Overall, a good place to start your career!

Minpunten

Very fast-paced environment which definitely isn't for everyone. Lots of necessary change.

1,0
8 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

The trauma bond nature of this job does bring you to meet those people who can go on to be real friends. If you want a job to be your social circle, GLG is just the place for you. Some of the health benefits are well worth it and far above industry standard.

Minpunten

There is not a single aspect of the company that has not depreciated in some noticeable way over the past three years (since Gemma took the helm). - Amenities have been stripped in every office (if your office is lucky enough to have survived) without any meaninful replacements. Multiple lunches a week have turned into pizza parties, but only when internal systems break. All US offices are failing for unique reasons. - Pay has increased unilaterally in the US twice in five years, once solely through a massive reorg and realignment of role scope. Raises are now tied to highly tiered (and capped) performance evaluations. Bonus schemes shift every year to remove payout at all seniorities, and the changes are not communicated in a forum where questions can be asked. - Technology integration has been haphasard at best and destructive at worst (e.g., AI tools cannot meet basic compliance requirements for tier 1 clients at go-live date). - Senior Leadership has not had a single 30-day period go by where the full Global Head+ org has stayed the same in nearly three years. Middle management has become almost entirely EMEA-based or EU citizens as they could not be laid off unlilke their US counterparts. - Organizational structures have collapsed, with senior leaders managing multiple mismatched groups of functional or client-facing roles, either in the name of cost savings or because someone saw double-digit growth for an entirely different segment over a decade ago. - Financial health, strategy updates, and company wide updates are effectively done. Any company- or BU-wide meetings are chances for internal PR; this also explains why they stopped doing them in-person (including when they're done on in-office days). - Resource allocation prioritizes those who already have them (e.g., more SVPs went on a President's Club trip than Managers, following only Senior Leaders in headcount). - ERGs are functionally dead, with stale group chats and programming locked behind whoever was the last person on an eboard years ago. Hiring diversity has plummeted and the organization is failing to attract talent that even understands what the job is (let alone could be considered top talent for it). Every day at GLG is another day figuring out what can be squeezed every so tightly further.

4
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle