Great on the Outside, Disappointing on the Inside - werkgeversreview Health Insurance Benefits Advisor (Agent) bij Gusto

2,0
20 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

The product is genuinely good, too bad the same can’t be said for how they treat the people who sell it.

Minpunten

Leadership talks a big game about people-first culture but the reality doesn’t match. The Chicago office expansion felt like a poorly thought-out experiment, new hires were brought on without a clear long-term commitment, and layoffs came without warning, leaving people blindsided. Crossing a billion dollars in revenue and still cutting employees sends a clear message about where workers rank on the priority list. Remote work flexibility is also a glaring weakness. For a company selling HR software to modern businesses, their internal stance on where employees can work is surprisingly rigid and hypocritical. The “flexibility” messaging is mostly optics. The broader concern is the AI roadmap. The automation push feels less like an innovation strategy and more like a slow wind-down of the workforce. Employees aren’t blind to it, it creates anxiety and erodes trust. The culture of transparency they promote externally is largely a facade internally.

Ontdek andere reviews over Gusto

5,0
1 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Great culture, everyone is there to help

Minpunten

None so far, still pretty new

2,0
13 mrt 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

- Decent comp - Higher level staff can WFH but only 3 out of 5 days.

Minpunten

- No hope of IPO and liquidity events are rare. - Talent is leaving but slowly due to crummy job market - Refusal to address underlying infrastructure issues in favor of new features that release to mixed customer reception. - Company tracks number of PRs opened, closed, merged as a performance metric, promotions have already been given based on these metrics. - Directionless AI mandates. Every engineer meeting is how LLMs will replace us but then no official guidance and what we're supposed to do and what processes require LLMs in a mandatory sense. - Increasing pressure on performance with associated metrics now being tracked but the metrics are useless. - C Suite and Board of Directors heavy LLM boosters with ties to other LLM companies - Official communications stating LLMs will take over the entire software lifecycle and error handling recovery aspects of the job. Which seems dangerous given the sensitivity of data we handle.

11
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle