Beware the priorities of c suite - werkgeversreview Anonieme werknemer bij Handshake

2,0
17 okt 2025
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Benefits and entry level pay are pretty good. Diverse team full of incredibly smart and driven individuals.

Minpunten

Executives are very obviously beholden to VC investors and behave as such. Short term profitability is prioritized over long term growth and the way they’ve putting all of their eggs in the AI basket demonstrates this. The AI bubble will pop, as did the housing bubble of 06 and the dot com bubble of the 90s and it will take AI companies with it. Because Handshake isn’t creating their own AI model, but rather training models for other companies, there will probably be a delayed impact to the bubble bursting… but there will be an impact nonetheless when the companies hiring Handshake to train their models go under and take their contracts with them. When that happens Garrett & friends as well as their VC investors will cash out and run, leaving lots of Handshakers to deal with the impact. Hope I’m wrong, but uI don’t believe I am. Promotions are few and far between. New teammates are brought on for 6 month contracts and are seldom converted to full time. Even once converted to full time, job stability does not exist. One round of layoffs was just done and everyone is on edge expecting more. Self service product is misleading about its payment structure and cancellation process. Having to defend it when customers reach out about unexpected billing feels unethical. Thoughtless implementation of AI into every workflow has led to a decrease in efficiency, especially around triaging and reporting bugs. Platform-breaking bugs would occur weekly or even multiple times per week. Every newly shipped feature had “unexpected” downstream consequences on other features. Middle management (VP level) was somehow simultaneously entirely detached from the work we were doing while also micromanaging cherry-picked metrics that don’t accurately measure performance.

Ontdek andere reviews over Handshake

5,0
24 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Remote opportunities for different projects.

Minpunten

Projects often pause, and we wish they would last longer.

1,0
22 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Challenging, interesting position in the short term.

Minpunten

The company has implemented a new timer policy that has “active” and “inactive” time on the backend that makes up for the total time. We were getting paid by total time (as you should), but HAI has changed it to only pay contributors for the time marked “active.” Time is “active” when scrolling, typing, and clicking within the specific task tab. Time is “inactive” when none of the previous actions are happening; i.e., when reading the task without moving the mouse or pressing keys, researching in another tab, etc. It sounds like they have changed the rules to only pay for active time, which has caused huge pay discrepancies. The percentage of inactive time is usually way more than active time on these timers due to the amount of reading, visual analyzing, thinking, and research required for some tasks. This behavior is unacceptable because time that seems “inactive” is still important to the quality and completion of tasks. They keep throwing accusations like “time thieves” around to justify it. If you respect yourself, pack it up and go somewhere else. I know most people who work at these places are desperate for income, but that’s exactly what they’re hoping for. They’re hoping you will be desperate enough to be taken advantage of.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle