Great place to get your career start as an intern - werkgeversreview Intern bij International Rescue Committee

4,0
7 jul 2017
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

-You're directly helping people and creating positive change in their lives -The diversity of the people you will work with-both clients and supervisors& interns is amazing and great experience -You have a good amount of responsibility as an intern and your supervisor will really allow you to grow in your respective department if you show them you are willing to do good work and show great interest -They let your skills shine and allow to work on/create new skills

Minpunten

-It is unpaid. Although you know this going in, interns do do a lot of work and it dawns on you occasionally how you wish you were getting paid for it. -The environment sometimes be disorganized and hectic

Ontdek andere reviews over International Rescue Committee

5,0
25 dec 2025
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Everyone is so nice here.

Minpunten

we have a lot of time to collaborate one project

2,0
22 apr 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Minpunten

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle