Great mission but top heavy and bureaucratic - werkgeversreview Project Manager bij International Rescue Committee

4,0
6 feb 2013
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

-- Great mission -- Money raised really goes to the people being served -- Very talented, dedicated staff members -- Staff is very aware of and dedicated to the mission -- Good benefits -- Generous sick time

Minpunten

-- Very top heavy organization with many directors, associate directors, deputy directors, etc. -- Large salary gap between the higher ups and those lower down with little opportunity for middle ground -- Very bureaucratic with many levels of to go through before things get done -- Heavy reliance on consultants -- Power struggles at the top -- Little connection of HQ staff to the field.

Ontdek andere reviews over International Rescue Committee

5,0
12 mrt 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Had a wonderful time interacting with the students and coworkers. Really appreciate the work of the IRC in supporting migrants.

Minpunten

No Cons to speak of

2,0
22 apr 2026
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

You will meet some amazing and passionate people here who are truly there for the mission. Many came to this country as refugees and immigrants themselves and continue to devote their lives to helping others going through similar experiences. If you end up on the right team, it's an extremely rewarding job.

Minpunten

Unfortunately, the HQ upper management makes it a toxic place to work. VPs regularly undercut each other publicly (including at all-team meetings and gossiping negatively with staff), especially when potential job cuts were on the horizon. C-Suite didn't listen to staff concerns about upper management and didn't investigate major departures by dedicated staff who left due to poor management despite their dedication to the mission. Leaders picked favorites, ignoring work performance (excusing mediocre performance in some, having high standards for others), and preferred yes-men over staff who wanted to think more critically about the work. Projects were pushed too quickly, despite concerns that it could be detrimental to clients. Positions given to unqualified internal staff who wouldn't be interviewed for the role as external candidates. Senior leaders (director and above) are more focused on keeping their jobs than the mission and will use lower staff work for their own career growth/safety. DEI didn't seem to apply for senior leader roles, where there was little, if any, diversity.

4
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle