Longterm Mental Health Consequences - werkgeversreview Junior Designer bij Kayser-Roth

1,0
26 aug 2022
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

I love the talented and hardworking staff, the product itself is fascinating, working somewhere with an extensive history is awesome, pay isn't bad

Minpunten

I left KR almost a year ago and still have anxiety attacks thinking about it. There were times I was so stressed out that I couldn't eat. Upward mobility is impossible if you don't have someone higher up fighting on your behalf. Lack of common sense and lots of time wasted pursuing stupid projects. Instead of a collaborative experience, people push their own agenda, even if it's not a good one. Lots of employee turnover, so you end up doing 5 people's jobs. Everyone is asked to be a sales person, a merchandiser, a designer, and a product developer- without the pay.

Ontdek andere reviews over Kayser-Roth

5,0
22 apr 2025
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

A supportive and energetic team environment with a strong sense of collaboration. Opportunities for career growth and team development. The company is experiencing positive momentum with new leadership and recent organizational restructuring. PS: A lot of the previous bad reviews are from people that are no longer part of the company because they have been let go or they retired.

Minpunten

Greater flexibility with remote work would be beneficial. Some long-tenured employees may be set in their ways, which presents an opportunity to encourage fresh perspectives and innovative thinking. Bringing in new voices could help support the company’s continued growth and evolution.

1,0
6 jun 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

-Nice coworkers in the NYC office -Convenient office location in Midtown Manhattan

Minpunten

-Toxic executive leadership created a culture of fear, stress, and constant uncertainty. The company president's management style negatively impacted morale across the organization, making day-to-day work unnecessarily difficult for many employees. -Frequent layoffs, budget cuts, and ongoing restructuring left employees feeling perpetually concerned about job security. Teams were repeatedly asked to do more with fewer resources, resulting in heavy workloads, long hours, and occasional weekend work without meaningful efforts to address staffing needs. -Communication from leadership was often inconsistent, with priorities changing frequently and little transparency around decisions. Employees were expected to pivot quickly, even when strategic direction shifted from day-to-day and week to week. -The organization remains highly top-down, and new ideas or alternative approaches were often met with resistance. Many talented employees became disengaged because they felt their expertise and feedback were not valued. -Benefits were expensive relative to the compensation offered, particularly for employees based in New York. Health plan options were better aligned to North Carolina employees than those working in NYC office. -HR appeared to have limited influence in addressing employee concerns involving senior leadership (mainly the president of the company), which contributed to a perception that accountability was inconsistent across the organization.

Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle