Dysfunctional and Under-Performing - werkgeversreview Anonieme werknemer bij Surescripts

2,0
11 mei 2015
Anonieme werknemer
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Work/life balance with flexible scheduling.

Minpunten

- Culture has become very oligarchic with the new CEO. Examples: Bonus structure went from fairly equal distribution amongst all employees to forced bell-curve distribution structure. This change was retroactive in Jan 2015 for the 2014 bonus payout. We effectively have 3:1 ratio of employees to managers - extremely top heavy and getting anything done takes monumental effort. - Human Resources is feckless. Examples: A company wide employee satisfaction survey was given for the 2nd time (in the last 3 years) back in Nov 2014. This survey was not anonymous (what?) and the results were never shared. Also, our performance review process was changed retroactively in Jan 2015 for our 2014 performance, effectively disregarding individual goals and objectives for the previous year. No real process for hiring qualified candidates, just hiring warm bodies.

Ontdek andere reviews over Surescripts

5,0
1 okt 2025
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Strong leadership, values and work life balance. Competitive above market benefits/compensation

Minpunten

new ownership driving workflow fluctuations, not necessarily a negative but more frequent fire drills and impromptu pivots

1,0
29 mei 2026
Aanbevelen
Goedkeuring directeur
Zakelijk vooruitzicht

Pluspunten

Excellent individual contributors and dedicated frontline teams who support one another through an incredibly difficult corporate culture.

Minpunten

Leadership within the Technology and Security organization operates entirely on fear, micromanagement, and self-preservation. Transparently reporting organizational risks or highlighting operational gaps is treated as a personal threat by management rather than a professional duty. The leadership style relies on moving goalposts, extreme gatekeeping (like exhausting daily interrogation-style briefing traps), and intentionally vague performance feedback so success can never actually be achieved. Top-performing professionals are systematically targeted, isolated, and managed out through fabricated performance issues to protect executive reputations. Furthermore, the HR department is completely toothless. Detailed, explicit exit interviews outlining this exact abusive behavior and naming impacted employees are met with empty empathy but zero corrective action. HR routinely chooses to protect toxic executives over maintaining basic workplace ethics. Since the corporate takeover, the culture has entirely shifted from psychological safety to compliance through fear, causing widespread burnout, anxiety, and a mad dash for the exits by top talent. If you are considering a job here, do yourself a favor and reach out to former employees on LinkedIn, and hear about it directly.

2
Bekijk reviews op: Nuttig|Beoordeling|Datum|Alle